التوافق في سمات شخصية المعلمين وطلبتهم ومدى تأثيرها على تقييم أداء الطلبة
Abstract
ملخص
هدفت الدراسة إلى الكشف عن أبرز السمات الشخصية التي يتمتع بها كل من الطلبة ومعلميهم، والتحقق من مدى التوافق بين المعلمين وطلبتهم في عدد من سمات الشخصية، ومعرفة أثر هذا التوافق على علامات الطلبة المقدرة والفعلية. تم استخدم مقياس كوستا وماكري (Costa & McCrae) لعوامل الشخصية الخمس بعد تكييفه بما يتناسب مع البيئة الأردنية. وتكوَّنت عينة الدراسة من (89) معلماً ومعلمة، إضافة إلى (244) طالباً وطالبةً من طلبتهم. أظهرت النتائج أن سمة العصابية كانت السمة السائدة لدى المعلمين ويقظة الضمير لدى الطلبة. كما أظهرت النتائج أن أعلى نسبة مئوية للتوافق في السمات الشخصية بين المعلمين وطلبتهم كانت في سمة الانفتاح وبين الطلبة ومعلميهم في سمة الانفتاح. كما أشارت النتائج إلى وجود أثر دال إحصائياً
لمستوى التوافق في سمات الانفتاح والطيبة ويقظة الضمير ولصالح المتوافقين في السمات الشخصية. إضافة إلى ذلك أظهرت النتائج وجود فروق ذات دلالة في متوسطات العلامة الفعلية للطالب تعزى لأثر مستوى التوافق في السمات الخمس للشخصية ولصالح المتوافقين في الشخصية. وكذلك أشارت النتائج إلى وجود أثر لمستوى التوافق في الفرق بين العلامة المقدرة والفعلية لسمات الانفتاح والطيبة ويقظة الضمير تعزى للمتوافقين في السمات الشخصية.
Compatibility in Personality Traits between Teachers and Their Students and its Effect on Students’ Achievement
Abstract
This study aimed at revealing the most prominent personal traits that students and their teachers have, and verifying the compatibility between both in each of the personality traits. The study also aimed at studying the effect of compatibility of personality traits between teachers and their students on actual and predicted school grades. The Costa and McCrae (1992) scale has been translated to Arabic and validated for the present population. The study sample consisted of (89) male and female teachers, and (244) of their students. The results showed that neurosis was the most prominent personality traits among teachers and conscientiousness for students. The results also showed that the highest percentage of compatibility in the personal traits between teachers and their students was the openness, and between students and their teachers was the openness. Results also showed significant effect due to compatibility of personality traits on students predicted grades in openness, kindness and conscientiousness in favor of higher compatibility level. In Addition, results showed a significant effect of personality traits compatibility on actual grades in all five-personality traits in favor of higher compatibility level. Finally, there were significant differences between predicted and actual grades due to the level of compatibility in conscientiousness, goodness and openness in favor of higher level if compatibility .
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (العربية)References
Reference:
Abdul Khaliq, A. (1996). Basic Dimensions of Personality. Dar Al Maarifa University: Alexandria.
Al Qaisy, L. & Thawabieh, A. M. (2016). Personal Traits and Their Relationship with Future Anxiety and Achievement. I-Manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, 10 (3), 11-20.
Allport, G. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Al-Rashed, A. (2001). Some Personality Traits and Their Impact on the Performance of the Teacher in The Primary Stage. Educational Magazine, Saudi Arabia, 15 (58), 57-68.
Arnon, S. & Reichel, N. (2007). Who is the ideal teacher? Am I? Similarity and difference in perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and of their own qualities as teachers. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 13(5), 441-464.
Awopetu, A. (2011). Student’s perception of teachers’ personality as a determinant of students’ interest in physical education. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(4), 251-255.
Bouki, N. (2015). The Five Major Factors of Personality and Their Relationship to Job Satisfaction Among UNRWA Teachers in the Irbid Educational Region. The Jordanian Journal of Educational Sciences, 11 (4), 447-427.
Cattell, R. (1950). Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cattell, R. (1990). Advances in cattellian personality theory. In L. pervin (ED), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.101-110). New York: Guilford press.
Cattell, R. (1968). The scientific analysis of personality 2 ed. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Costa, P. & McCrae, R. (1985). The Neo Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Engler, B. (2013). Personality theories. USAL: Nelson Education.
Eryilmaz, A. (2014). Perceived Personality Traits and Types of Teachers and Their Relationship to the Subjective Well-Being and Academic Achievements of Adolescents. Educational sciences: Theory and practice, 14(6), 2049-2062.
Ewen, R. (2014). An introduction to theories of personality. 6th ed. New York: Psychology Press.
Eysenck, H. (1950). Dimensions of personality (Vol. 5). USA: Transaction Publishers.
Eysenck, H. (1953). The logical basis of factor analysis. American Psychologist, 8 (3), 105-114.
Eysenck, H. )1994). Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of paradigm. Journal of personality and social psychology. 73 (6), 1224-1237.
Fairhurst, A. & Fairhurst, L. (1995). Effective teaching, effective learning: Making the personality connection in your classroom. UK: Hachette.
Garcia, P. (2010). The impact of teacher personality styles on academic excellence of secondary students (PhD thesis, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, USA).
Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Guilford, J. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gurrey, P. (1963). Education and the training of teachers. London: Longman.
Kim, L. & MacCann, C. (2016). Student-Teacher Personality Similarity as a Predictor of Student Educational Experience and Motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 10)1), 490.
Klassen, R. & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.
Läänemets, U., Kalamees-Ruubel, K., & Sepp, A. (2012). What Makes a Good Teacher? Voices of Estonian Students. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 79(1), 27-31.
Mariana, C., Fabiana, M., & Andreea, N. (2016). The personality of kindergarden teachers. Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology. 7 (1), 71-84.
Mori, S., & Tanabe, Y. (2014). Influence of Instructor Personality on Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Comparison between English Majors and Non-English Majors. English Language Teaching, 8 (1), 1-10.
Nkomo, N. & Fakrogha, E. (2016). Teacher Personality and Effective Classroom. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 5 (13), 10-14.
Obeidi, M. (2011). Personal Psychology. House of Culture: Amman.
Odah, A. (2010). Measurement and Evaluation in The Teaching Process, House of Hope: Irbid.
Ortenblad, A., Koris, R & Pihlak, U. (2017). Does it matter who teaches you? A study on the relevance of matching students' and teachers' personalities. The International Journal of Management Education. 15 (3), 520–527.
Patrick, C. (2011). Student evaluations of teaching: effects of the Big Five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (2), 239-249.
Pawlowska, D, Westerman, J, Bergman, S & Huelsman, T. (2014). Student personality, classroom environment, and student outcomes: A person–environment fit analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 180-193.
Peklaj, C., Podlesek, A., & Pečjak, S. (2015). Gender, previous knowledge, personality traits and subject-specific motivation as predictors of students’ math grade in upper-secondary school. European journal of psychology of education, 30 (3), 313-330.
Penly, J. & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five emotional Responses and coping with stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32 (7), 1215-1228.
Polk, J. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107 (4), 23-29.
Rausch, T., Karing, C., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2015). Personality similarity between teachers and their students influences teacher judgment of student achievement. Educational Psychology, 36 (5), 863-878.
Ready, D. & Wright D. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers perceptions of young children's cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48 (2), 335-360.
Roberts, B. (2009). Back to the future: Personality and assessment and personality development. Journal of research in personality, 43 (2), 137-145.
Rosellini, A. & Brown, T. (2011). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Latent structure and relationships with dimensions of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large clinical sample. Assessment, 18(1), 27-38.
Salama, M. (1990). A Study of Some Social, Cognitive and Cognitive Variables Related to The Level of Performance of Students of the Faculty of Education at Qatar University in the Field of Practical Education. Master Thesis Unpublished Faculty of Education, Tanta University, Egypt.
Sudkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Moller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104 (3), 743–762.
Tanabe, Y. & Mori, S. (2013). Effects of perceived teacher personality on student class evaluations: a comparison between Japanese instructors and native English-speaking instructors. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3 (3), 53-65.
Thorndik, R & E. (1986). Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, 4th ed., (Translated by Abdallah Zeid Al Kilani and Abdul Rahman Adas), John Wiley and Sons, Jordan Training Center.
Ulug, M., Ozden, M. & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). The effects of teachers’ attitudes on students’ personality and performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 738-742.
Vlad, I. & Ciascai, L. (2014). Students' Perception of the Personal Characteristics of Ideal Teacher (I). Pilot Study. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 7 (2), 41-47.
Wubbels, T. & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research 43, 6–24.
Zee, M., Koomen, H. & Van der Veen, I. (2013). Student–teacher relationship quality and academic adjustment in upper elementary school: The role of student personality. Journal of school psychology, 51 (4), 517-533.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35682/634
Published by
MUTAH UNIVERSITY