Against An Auxiliary-based Categorization of Modals in Jordanian Arabic
Abstract
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed morphosyntactic analysis of modals in Jordanian Arabic (JA henceforth). It is mainly concerned withdefending an alternative perspective of the conventional auxiliary-based categorization of modals in Arabic in general and in JA in particular.Contra to the long-held belief in the literature of Arabic where modals are categorized as auxiliary verbs, the paper shows with empirical evidence that the auxiliary-based analysis fails to account for the inconsistent and non-coherent morphosyntactic behavior of the JA modals laazim‘must’,mumkin/yemkin ‘may/might’ andbigdar ‘can/could’. The paper also shows that only the modal bigdar ‘can/could’ is the closest modal to the auxiliary category in JA. However, the paper argues that such modal should belong to a ‘quasi-auxiliary’ category rather than the ‘conventionalauxiliary’category.
قراءة مغايرة في تصنيف التراكيب الدالة
على الاحتمال والضرورة في اللهجة الأردنية كأفعال مساعدة
ملخص
تهدف هذه الدراسة إلى تقديم قراءة نحوية وصرفية تفسيرية دقيقة للتراكيب الدالة على الضرورة والاحتمال والاستطاعة في اللهجة الأردنية. وقد قدمت الدراسة تصنيفًا نحويًا وصرفيًا مغايرًا للتصنيف النحوي والصرفي الشائع والذي كان يصنِّف هذه التراكيب كأفعال مساعدة في اللهجة الأردنية واللهجات العربية السابقة. وبخلاف الدراسات السابقة والتي كانت تصنِّف هذه التراكيب كأفعال مساعدة، أظهرت الدراسة أن التصنيف النحوي والصرفي الشائع لهذه التراكيب لا يمكن أن يفسرالنمط النحوي والصرفي لهذه التراكيب (لازم، ممكن وبقدر) والذي يتصف بكونه نسقًا غير مترابط وغير متسق نحويًا وصرفيًا. أما التراكيب الدالة على الاستطاعة، مثل "بقدر"، فقد خَلُصَت الدراسة إلى أن هذه التراكيب هي الأقرب نحويا وصرفيا للأفعال المساعدة في اللهجة الأردنية، وأوصت الدراسة بضرورة تصنيفها تحت مسمى جديد وهو "شبه فعل مساعد" وليس "فعل مساعد" كما هو الحال في التصنيفات النحوية الشائعة.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Alexander, L. (1988). Longman English grammar. London: Longman.
Al-Horais, N. (2012). On the universality of auxiliary verbs.Journal of Universal Language, 13(1), 7-30.
Ali, M. (1994). The expression of modality in modern standard Arabic (Doctoral dissertation), University of London, UK.
Althawab, A. S. (2014). Modality in English and Arabic: Description and analysis (Doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, UK.
Barbiers, S. (2006). The syntax of modal auxiliaries. In M. Everaert& H. van
Riemsdijk (Eds.), Theblackwell companion to syntax, vol. 5, chap. 70, (pp.1–22). Blackwell Publisher.
Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. Oxford University Press.
Brenann, V. (1993).Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs (Doctoral dissertation).University of Massachusetts Amhesrt.
Brustad, K. E. (2000). The syntax of spoken Arabic.Georgetown University Press.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. &Pagluica, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. The University of Chicago Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding.Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building (pp. 1 – 52). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program.MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & H. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp.89 – 155). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Cowell, M.W. (1964). A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
De Haan, F. (2004). Typological approaches to modality. In W. Frawley (Ed.), Modality (pp. 27- 70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Downing, A. & Locke, P. (1992). A university English grammar.Routledge.
Eisele, J. (1988). The syntax and semantics of tense, aspect, and time reference in Cairene Arabic (Doctoral Dissertation).University of Chicago.
Eisle, J. (1992). Cairene Arabic auxiliaries and the category of AUX.In E. Broselow, M. Eid& J. Mccarthy (Eds.), Perspective of Arabic linguistics (pp.143-169). John Benjamins.
Emonds, J. (1985). A unified theory of syntactic categories.Foris, Dordrecht.
Fehri, F. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words.Kluwer AcademicPublisher.
Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics.Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum.
Givón, T. (1982). Evidentiality and epistemic space.Studies in Language, 6, 23-49.
Givon, T. (1989). Syntax: An introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English.Foundations of language, 6(3), 322-361.
Harrell, R. (1990). A short reference grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Hauge, H. (2003). Towards a unified representation of English and Norwegian auxiliaries. Nordic Journal of English Studies 2(1), 53-74.
Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: structures, functions, and variations. London: Longman Linguistic Library.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar 0f the English language.Cambridge University Press.
Jelinek, E. (1984). On defining categories: AUX and predicate in Egyptian colloquial Arabic (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Arizona.
Kearns, K. (2000). Semantics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kim, J. Sells, P. (2008). English syntax: An introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality.In H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in word semantics (pp. 38-74). Berlin, de Gruyter,
Leech, G. (2004). Meaning and the English verb. Harlow, Pearson Education.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Machova, D. (2013). Modal verbs from a cross linguistic perspective. In T. Roman, B. J. Gregory & N. Katarina (Eds.), ZlIn Proceedings in Humanities (pp. 79-89). Tomas Bata University, Zln, Czech Republic
Mitchell, T. & El-Hassan, S. (1994). Modality, mood, and aspect in spoken Arabic with special reference to Egypt and the levant.Kegan Paul International.
Nauze, F. (2008) Modality in typological perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Nuyts, J. (2005). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: a cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Palmer, F. (1990). Modality and the English modals, 2nd edition. London: Longmans.
Palmer, F. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F. (1995). Negation and the modals of possibility and necessity.In J. Bybee& S. Fleischman (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse(p. 453-72). Amsterdam.
Palmer, F. (2001). Mood and modality, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Payne, T. (2011). Understanding English grammar: A linguisticintroduction.
Cambridge: Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., &Svartvik, J. (1985).A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
Radford, A. (1997). Syntax: A minimalist introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ryding, K. (2005). A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic.Cambridge University Press.
Safi, A. B. (2001). Lexicalization and modalization of prepositions in English-Arabic translation. International Journal of Arabic- English Studies, 2(1), 35-60.
Sag, I., Wasow, T. & Bender, E. (2003).Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Steel, S. (1981). An encyclopedia of AUX: a study in cross-linguistic equivalence. The MIT press.
Taylor, J. (2003). Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Traugott, E. & Dasher, R. (2002).Regularity in semantic change.Cambridge University Press.
Vanhove, M., Miller, C., &Caubet, D. (2009).The grammaticalisation of modal auxiliaries in Maltese and Arabic vernaculars of the Mediterranean area.Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 44, 325-362.
Wilmsen, D. (2013). Grammaticalization of the Arabic demonstrative Iyyā- as a pronominal object marker in ditransitive verbs.Journal of Semitic Studies, 58(1), 149-167.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35682/1756
Published by
MUTAH UNIVERSITY