مطابقة فقرات اختبار في تصميم البحث لنموذج التجانس الاطرادي لنظرية الاستجابة للفقرة
Abstract
مطابقة فقرات اختبار في تصميم البحث لنموذج التجانس الاطرادي لنظرية الاستجابة للفقرة
صبري حسن الطراونة[1]
ملخص
هدفت الدراسة إلى مطابقة فقرات اختبار في تصميم البحث لنموذج التجانس الاطرادي لنظرية الاستجابة للفقرة، تكونت عينة الدراسة من (212) طالباً وطالبةً من طلاب الماجستير في كلية العلوم التربوية في جامعة مؤتة، تكون الاختبار بصورته النهائية من (40) فقرة، تم التحقق من مطابقة أفراد عينة الدراسة وفقرات الاختبار لافتراضات نموذج التجانس الاطرادي، وتم حساب معاملات الصعوبة والتمييز والتخمين لفقرات الاختبار، وتراوحت قيم معاملات الصعوبة بين (1.271-) و(1.521)، وتراوحت قيم معاملات التمييز بين (0.289) و(1.412) وتراوحت قيم معاملات التخمين بين (0.009) و (0.206).
الكلمات الدالة: نظرية الاستجابة للفقرة, نموذج التجانس الاطرادي، مطابقة الفقرات.
Item Stratification of Test in Research Design to the Homogeneous Monotone of the Item Response Theory Model
Sabri Hassan Altarawneh[2]
Abstract
The study aimed at item stratification of test in research design to the homogeneous monotone of the item response theory model. The study sample consisted of (212) students in the Faculty of Educational Sciences at Mutah University. The test consisted of (40) items, the study sample and test items according to monotone item response theory model were verified. Item difficulty, item discrimination and Item guessing coefficients were calculated for the test items, items difficulty between (-1.271) and (1.521), items discrimination between 0.289) and (1.412) and items guessing between (0.009) and (0.206).
Keywords: Item response theory, Monotone homogeneous model, Item stratification.
[1] كلية العلوم التربوية، جامعة مؤتة.
تاريخ تقديم البحث: 18/4/2019م. تاريخ قبول البحث: 4/8/2019م .
© جميع حقوق النشر محفوظة لجامعة مؤتة، الكرك، المملكة الأردنية الهاشمية، 2022 م.
[2] College of Educational Sciences, Mutah University.
Received: 18/4/2019. Accepted: 4/8/2019.
© All rights reserved to Mutah University, Karak, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, 2022.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Reference:
Alam, S. (2005). Undimnshnal and Mutedimnshnal Item Respunse test and there Applide in Psychometric an Educatinal Measurement, dar alfikr alaraby, Cairo.
Alnofei, A. (2018). The Standardization of- Oomen SON-R6-40 Nonverbal Intelligence on Postgraduate Students of College of Education Umm, Al- Qura University on the Light of Monotone Homogeneous Model (MHM )Mokken), Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 1(19), 249-292.
Baker, F.(2001). The Basic of Item Response Theory, Boston: Carol Boston.
Basokcu, O & Ogretmen, T. (2014). Comparison of parametric and nonparametric item response techniques in determining differential item functioning in polytomous scale, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 3(2), 31-38.
Demars, C (2010). Item Response Theory, New York: oxford University press.
Douglas, J. (1997). Joint Consistency of Nonparametric Item Characteristic Curves and Ability Estimation. Psychometrika, 62, 7-28.
Dyehouse, M . (2009). A Comparison of Model-Data Fit For Parametric & Nonparametric Item Response Theory Models Using Ordinal-Level Ratings. Dissertation Abstract International. (No.3379330).
Hambleton, R & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory Principles and Applications. Boston: Nijhoff Publishing.
Hambleton, R. swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. (1991). Fundamental of Item Response Theory, London: sage publications.
Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology Review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and item. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9 (2), 139-164.
Hays, R. Liu, H. Spritzer, K & Cella, D. (2007). Item Response Theory Analyses of Physical Functioning Items in the Medical Outcomes Study. Journal of Medical Care, 45(5), 533-538.
Junker, B & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive Assessment Models With Few Assumptions & Connections With Nonparametric Item Response Theory, Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 258-272.
Kim, S. Cohen, A & Lin, Y. (2005). LDID: a Computer program for local dependence indices for dichotomous item, Georgia: University of Georgia.
Linden, W & Hambleton, R. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.
Manasreh, S (2014). Properties of an ability distribution and Item Parameters of the National Test to Monitor and Control the Quality of Education for Fourth Grade According to Parametric and nonparametric Models of Item Response theory, Dissertation of Doctoral, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Marashoud, M. (2014). Building a Computerized Item Bank in Statistic for the Students of Humanities Faculties at Al-Najah National University Palestine Using NonParamitric Mokken Model, Dissertation of Doctoral, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Masadeh, M. (2013). The Effect of the Test Item Format in Item Fit of the Mokken non Paramitric Model and two parametric Model, Dissertation of Doctoral, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Mokken, R. (1971). A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. Netharland: Congress Catalog Card.
Mokken, R & Lewis, C (1982). A Nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses, Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417-430.
Momani, R. (2012). Acomparison of item fit for Mokken non-paramitric and the two parameter Model, Dissertation of Doctoral, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan.
Sijtsm, K. (1998). Methodology review: Nonparametric IRT approaches to the analysis of dichotomous item scores, Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 3-31.
Sijtsma, K & Hemker, B. (2000). A Taxonomy of IRT Models For Ordering of Persons and Items Using Simple Sum Scores, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 391-415.
Sijtsma, K. & Molenaar, I. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Sage Publication, London: International Educational and Professional Publisher.
Sijtsma, K & Verweij, A. (1992). Mokken scale analysis: the cortical Considerations and an applications to transitive tasks, Applied Measurement in Education, 5(4),355 – 373
Stochl, J. (2006). Nonparametric extension of item response theory models and its usefulness for assessment of dimensionality of motor tests. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, 42(1), 75–94.
Susan. E & Steven, P. (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van der Ark, A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R, Journal of Statistical Software, 20(11),1-19.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.35682/1090
Published by
MUTAH UNIVERSITY